<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheap Vista PC Vs. McAfee SpamKiller Detect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.to-tech.com/blog/2007/01/19/cheap-vista-pc-vs-mcafee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.to-tech.com/blog/2007/01/19/cheap-vista-pc-vs-mcafee/</link>
	<description>Todd Ogasawara's Tech Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.to-tech.com/blog/2007/01/19/cheap-vista-pc-vs-mcafee/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.to-tech.com/blog/2007/01/19/cheap-vista-pc-vs-mcafee/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Same thing happened here, same solution.  I _think_ McAfee Spamkiller is registered in control panel as , but deleted the program itself from the c:\program files\ and haven't had the guts to test this hypothesis.  It was eating ~half of one CPU, which is why I didn't catch it right away. And here I thought that Vista was just making better use of the Core 2 duo processor(s)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same thing happened here, same solution.  I _think_ McAfee Spamkiller is registered in control panel as , but deleted the program itself from the c:\program files\ and haven&#8217;t had the guts to test this hypothesis.  It was eating ~half of one CPU, which is why I didn&#8217;t catch it right away. And here I thought that Vista was just making better use of the Core 2 duo processor(s)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.348 seconds -->
